MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108122666 · doi:10.1139/t2012-050

Determination of small-strain stiffness of Shanghai clay on prismatic soil specimen

2012· article· en· W2108122666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qing Li, C.W.W. Ng, G.B. Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStiffnessGeotechnical engineeringShear (geology)Shear modulusAnisotropyIsotropyMaterials scienceGeologyVoid ratioPlane stressShear stressComposite materialStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although a large number of tunnels and deep excavations have been constructed in Shanghai, small-strain stiffness properties of natural Shanghai clay have rarely been reported in the literature. In this study, the degree of inherent stiffness anisotropy of natural Shanghai clay was investigated in a triaxial apparatus equipped with local strain transducers and a shear-wave velocity measurement system. Three sets of side-mounted bender elements, consisting of one transmitter and two receivers each, were installed on a prismatic specimen. Two series of triaxial tests on prismatic specimens of intact Shanghai clay were carried out under an isotropic stress state. Shear-wave velocities and hence elastic shear moduli in different planes were determined from bender element measurements. The cross-correlation method using two received signals gives rise to the most objective and repeatable results on shear-wave velocities in comparison with other commonly used methods. Intact Shanghai clay clearly exhibits inherent stiffness anisotropy in terms of its elastic shear modulus ratio (G 0(hh) /G 0(hv) ) of about 1.2 for a mean effective stress varying from 50 to 400 kPa. The measured higher stiffness in the horizontal plane may be attributed to the stronger layering structure in the horizontal bedding plane. A unique relationship is found that relates the normalized shear moduli to the stress state in each plane by incorporating a void ratio function in the form of F(e) = e –2.6 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.716

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207