Thrombosis and Thromboembolic Complications in Fontan Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hemodynamic fluctuations and thromboembolic complications are significant areas of concern during the postoperative management of patients with univentricular hearts. The objective of this study is to review the incidence and risk factors associated with thrombosis and thromboembolic complications following total cavopulmonary anastomosis, the third stage of the palliative surgical procedure. A literature search of published evidence was conducted on OvidSP MEDLINE(R) and Embase followed by paired title, abstract, and full-text screening based on specific inclusion criteria. High risks of thromboembolic outcomes were identified across studies, with variable incidences between 3% and 20%, high mortality rates up to 38%, and an inverse relationship with prophylaxis treatment administration. Several risk factors for thrombotic complications, including chronic systemic venous hypertension, protein-losing enteropathy, passive blood flow, atrial arrhythmias, conduit stenosis, prosthetic material use, coagulation factor abnormalities, and several patient characteristics were identified. Based on these findings, a prophylactic anticoagulation algorithm has been proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".