Analysis of microearthquake data at Cold Lake and its applications to reservoir monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract More than four months of continuously recorded micro-earthquake data acquired at Cold Lake, Canada, was analyzed using advanced algorithms for microearthquake location and subsurface tomography. Robust determination of the spatial, temporal, and magnitude distribution of seismicity is the first step toward understanding the relationship between the stress perturbations caused by the cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process and seismicity. Acquisition geometry was constrained because the receivers were located in a single vertical borehole. Despite this constraint, we were successful in improving event locations by use of the double-difference method, which highlights several tight event clusters. The deep cluster at a depth of 400m, just above the oil reservoir, shows very high seismicity during the CSS processes. A second cluster is observed at shallower depths in the successive steam cycle. This suggests that repeated steaming causes the deformation to spread to shallower depths. The number of events, however, decreases in the second steam cycle. Even though some of the largest events occur below the Clearwater reservoir, we observed few events in the reservoir itself, indicating that the reservoir may be an aseismic region. The size and distribution of seismicity during the first cycle agrees with a Mohr's circle analysis using simple geomechanical modeling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".