MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coastal Boundary Layer Characteristics during Summer Stratification in Lake Ontario

2001· article· en· W2108329879 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDownwellingThermoclineGeologyUpwellingBoundary layerStratification (seeds)BaroclinityTurbulenceInternal waveKelvin waveMean flowGeophysicsOceanographyAtmospheric sciencesMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simultaneous measurements of Eulerian and Lagrangian currents along the north shore of Lake Ontario are analyzed to provide the mean flow properties and horizontal turbulent exchange characteristics in the coastal boundary layer (CBL). The summer coastal boundary layer is characterized by a frictional boundary layer (FBL) of a width of ∼3 km, in which shore and bottom friction affects the flow. In this regime the currents are predominantly shore parallel and persistent. The outer boundary layer also called an inertial boundary layer (IBL), typically of the order of 5–6 km wide, is a consequence of the adjustment of inertial oscillations to the lateral boundary. During the summer season within the CBL, the current motions are associated with thermocline displacements. The eastward (westward) wind stress causes thermocline elevation (depression) causing upwelling (downwelling). The mean subsurface westward currents associated with downwelling events are typically stronger in comparison to weak eastward flow during upwelling. Further, upwelling events are characterized by reduced low frequency motion (>1 day) and significant near-inertial (∼17 h) currents. The width of the CBL decreases during upwelling and increases during downwelling. Internal waves generated by baroclinic seiches during these events have periods from 11 to 17 hours. The near-surface horizontal exchange coefficients calculated from Lagrangian measurements are higher than those from subsurface Eulerian values. Upwelling events show that the turbulent kinetic energy is higher than mean flow kinetic energy (MKE) in the CBL, and cross-shore turbulent exchange increases in the IBL. During downwelling the alongshore exchange coefficients are higher in the FBL, whereas cross-shore exchanges are higher in the IBL. Downwelling events are also characterized by increased contribution from the MKE rather than the turbulent kinetic energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it