MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108362750 · doi:10.1109/hpcsim.2011.5999857

Automated inventory tracking system prototype in cloud

2011· article· en· W2108362750 on OpenAlexaff
Rob Grmek, Youry Khmelevsky, Dmitry Syrotovsky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsOkanagan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer sciencePoint of saleTracking systemProcess (computing)Order processingAuditBusinessSupply chainWorld Wide WebMarketingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate possible solutions for alleviating retail manufacturers of logistical concerns by using inexpensive cell phones with WAP and WiFi capabilities, low resolution digital cameras, and open source applications for web hosts in the cloud to store and process business information. The proposed inventory tracking system prototype is aimed at the company's agents whose responsibilities are to track and manage the retailer's merchandise as it flows between suppliers and consumers. The system can eliminate inefficiencies in the process of tracking inventory and orders processing, while doing so with minimal economic cost by utilizing inexpensive cell phones from one side and inexpensive web hosting in the cloud on the other side. This means to use inexpensive options in terms of both hardware and software, and services in the cloud for data processing and storage as well as to automate the process of physically tracking inventory so less time is spent on this particular task. Such a system with further development can also address business critical question of monitoring sales personnel adherence to the assigned sales routes, collection of other information from the retail outlets (products distribution, pricing, shelving, out-of-stock situations etc.). There are several areas where the proposed solution can be used: on-shelf availability check and inventory calculation (used both by retailers' personnel and by the manufacturer's sales force); orders taking (to automate the process); retail audit (used by the specialized commercial or governmental agencies) and by consumer protection rights agencies. From the technical point of view the goal is to investigate the available open source solutions so they may be integrated with a new proposed system for business utilization. The paper outlines the design of the proposed system and the prototype implementation results, as well as our problems during prototype design and development, and our future plans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207