Association of Intra-Operative Metaphyseal Fractures with Prosthesis Size during Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the possible causes of intra-operative metaphyseal fractures in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture. METHODS: 36 men and 228 women aged 61 to 89 years with 273 displaced femoral neck fractures underwent hemiarthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated Furlong bipolar prosthesis. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken immediately after surgery to evaluate the presence and type of any intra-operative fractures (classified according to the Vancouver system) and their effect on stem stability or osseointegration. Pain and clinical outcomes were evaluated using a visual analogue scale and the Harris Hip Score. RESULTS: Regarding the 273 surgeries for displaced femoral neck fracture, 28 (10%) were associated with intra-operative metaphyseal fracture (21 Vancouver type AL and 7 type AG). There was a correlation between intra-operative metaphyseal fractures and stem size. A size-9 stem was used in 64 surgeries without any fracture. A size-10 stem was used in 129 surgeries in which 11 (9%) sustained fractures, and a size-12 stem was used in 80 surgeries in which 17 (21%) sustained fractures. Postoperatively, 25 cases developed hip-related problems (thigh pain=14 and periprosthetic fractures=8) after 3 to 18 months. No patient whose metaphyseal fracture was fixed had hip problems. CONCLUSION: In elderly women with compromised bone quality, extra care is needed to achieve better fitting so as to avoid iatrogenic metaphyseal fractures. Under-sizing or cementing of the prosthesis is recommended when encountering difficulties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".