The molecular mechanism of acylation stimulating protein regulation of adipophilin and perilipin expression: Involvement of phosphoinositide 3‐kinase and phospholipase C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The novel adipokine acylation stimulating protein (ASP) is involved in lipid metabolism and obesity-related disorders. Adipophilin and perilipin, two members of the lipid droplet protein family, participate not only in fat storage within adipocytes, but also in ectopic lipid deposition in the form of cytoplasmic triglyceride (TG) droplets within many types of mammalian cells. During differentiation to mature adipocytes, mechanisms controlling the synthesis and turnover of these lipid droplet proteins are only partially understood, the mechanisms regulating gene/protein expression as yet unidentified. In our previous study, ASP has been shown to regulate adipophilin and perilipin expression to facilitate TG synthesis during 3T3-L1 cell differentiation. Our aim in this study was to provide insight into the physiological importance of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and phospholipase C (PLC) in ASP-triggered alteration of adipophilin and perilipin expression. We found that acute (2.5 h) inhibition of PLC or PI3K results in a decrease in mRNA and protein of perilipin and adipophilin at any time during differentiation. The fact that there is such a rapid change even with mRNA levels suggests a rapid turnover of both mRNA and protein independent of a direct ASP effect. Also, the presence of these inhibitors blocked the ASP stimulatory effects with a maximal decrease in gene and protein expression of adipophilin (-45% and -60%, respectively, P < 0.01) and perilipin (-96% and -63%, respectively, P < 0.01 and P < 0.05). These findings provide further understanding of the adipogenic properties of ASP in adipocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".