MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108443808 · doi:10.1369/jhc.6a7144.2007

Distribution of Neuronal Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein in Human Tissues

2007· article· en· W2108443808 on OpenAlexafffund
Johannes Maier, Sylvia Balabanian, Cynthia R. Coffill, Alexandra Stewart, Louise Pelletier, Douglas J. Franks, Nathalie H. Gendron, Alex MacKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMuscular Dystrophy Association
KeywordsBiologyWestern blotApoptosisInhibitor of apoptosisMolecular biologyImmunohistochemistryNeurodegenerationGene expressionGenePathologyProgrammed cell deathImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The neuronal apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) gene, also known as the baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis repeat-containing protein 1 (BIRC1) gene, is a member of the inhibitors of apoptosis (IAP) family and was first characterized as a candidate gene for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). The expression of NAIP has been thoroughly studied in the central nervous system and overlaps the pattern of neurodegeneration in SMA. Recent studies have pointed to a role for NAIP in non-neuronal cells. We report here the production of a specific anti-NAIP antibody and the profile of NAIP expression in human adult tissues by Western blot and immunohistochemical detection methods. NAIP was detected in a number of tissues by Western blot analysis, but immunohistochemistry revealed that NAIP's presence in certain tissues, such as liver, lung, and spleen, is most likely due to macrophage infiltration. In the small intestine, the expression of NAIP coincides with the expression of p21(WAF1). This observation, coupled with findings from other groups, suggests a role for NAIP in increasing the survival of cells undergoing terminal differentiation as well as the possibility that the protein serves as an intestinal pathogen recognition protein. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Histochemistry & CytochemistrySame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207