Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 47-yr-old female was referred to a tertiary centre for further evaluation of chronic cough, fever, progressive exertional dyspnoea and fatigue. From a respiratory point of view she had been well until 7 months previously when she had started to experience systemic fatigue, low-grade fever and chronic dry cough. A computed tomography scan of the chest demonstrated diffuse bilateral ground-glass, ill-defined pulmonary opacities affecting all lobes. Some had central ground-glass hazy density with peripheral areas of increased opacity, which is consistent with "reversed halo sign". Cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP) is a clinical, radiological and pathological diagnosis which is made when no definite cause, such as infection or connective tissue disease, is found. It is characterised histopathologically by the presence of patchy distribution of granulation tissue, which consists of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts embedded in a loose connective matrix, present in the lumen of the distal airspaces including alveoli, alveolar ducts and bronchioles. This case report illustrates the association of the reversed halo sign with COP. Although only seen in one fifth of patients with the disease, it appears to suggest the diagnosis of COP and, with proper clinical correlation, it may be another diagnostic adjunct.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".