Cytogenetic screening of a canadian pig breeding unit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A cytogenetic study was undertaken on the chromosomal makeup and breeding data of 29 boars housed in a Canadian pig farm. Blood cultures were made and chromosome spreads were examined, searching for carriers of chromosomal abnormalities. The investigation revealed that twenty-six individuals had a normal karyotype and 3 (10.3%) carried the following aberrations: (a) two 1/6 translocations in two - unrelated - individuals, (b) one reciprocal translocation rcp(10;13). The litter size of the two boars carrying the 1/6 translocation was, on average, 6.5 and 5.8, respectively. The mean size of the litter sired by the boar carrying the rcp(10;13) was 6.0. As compared with the average litter size (11.0) sired by the normal boars in the herd, the translocations described here seemed to be responsible for ~35% decrease in prolificacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".