MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108658072 · doi:10.5194/angeo-22-1947-2004

The OI 630.0 and 557.7nm dayglow measured by WINDII and modeled by TRANSCAR

2004· article· en· W2108658072 on OpenAlexfundno aff
F. Culot, C. Lathuillère, Jean Lilensten, Olivier Witasse

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales Geophysicae · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsSolar zenith angleZenithPhysicsAtmospheric sciencesFlux (metallurgy)SatelliteOrbit (dynamics)Computational physicsEnvironmental scienceOpticsAstronomyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. A 1-D fluid/kinetic code is used to model WIND Imaging Interferometer measurements of the atomic oxygen (3P-1D) red and (-1D-1S) green thermospheric dayglows at 630.0nm and 557.7nm. This modelling is performed for different latitude and solar zenith angle conditions, in order to reproduce the measurements all along the satellite orbit. Results are successfully compared to the interferometer's observations, reproducing the measured volume emission rates, together with the maximum emission altitude. A good agreement is found regardless of the position considered along the satellite orbit, meaning that the solar flux and the solar zenith angle influences were successfully taken into account. Together with this model study, a four-year red and green oxygen lines set of WINDII data is analysed with regards to those geophysical parameters. Correlations between volume emission rates and solar flux are evaluated and it is found that the MgII index is better suited to this kind of study than the f10.7 decimetric index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales GeophysicaeSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207