MexR Repressor of the <i>mexAB-oprM</i> Multidrug Efflux Operon of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> : Identification of MexR Binding Sites in the <i>mexA-mexR</i> Intergenic Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The MexR repressor of the mexAB-oprM multidrug efflux operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was purified as a C-terminal histidine-tagged protein by metal chelate affinity chromatography. The purified protein was shown to bind ca. 200 bp upstream of mexA, at two sites, each of which contains a repeat of the nucleotide sequence GTTGA in inverse orientation. DNA sequence analysis identified mexA and mexR promoters within the MexR binding regions, consistent with the previously observed negative regulation of mexR and mexAB-oprM expression by MexR. Transcription of mexA from the promoter originating within the MexR binding site II was confirmed and shown to be markedly enhanced in a nalB (i.e., mexR) mutant of P. aeruginosa. A second mexA promoter was also identified, ca. 70 bp upstream of mexAB-oprM, and transcription from this promoter appeared to occur in both the wild type and a nalB mutant. Production of MexAB-OprM in wild-type cells may be due to expression from a constitutively expressed proximal promoter, while MexAB-OprM hyperexpression in nalB mutants is due to the additional expression from a MexR-regulated distal promoter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".