MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108700726 · doi:10.1002/qj.2665

Performance of 4D‐Var <scp>NWP</scp>‐based nowcasting of precipitation at the Met Office for summer 2012

2015· article· en· W2108700726 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Ballard, Zhihong Li, David Simonin, Jean‐François Caron

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNowcastingMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyData assimilationNumerical weather predictionPrecipitationGeostationary Operational Environmental SatelliteRadarSevere weatherQuantitative precipitation forecastStormSatelliteGeographyGeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Met Office has developed and demonstrated an hourly cycling 1.5 km resolution NWP‐based nowcast system (0–6 h forecasts) using four‐dimensional variational data assimilation (4D‐Var). This was known as the Nowcasting Demonstration Project (NDP), and was principally for prediction of convective storms for flood forecasting. The NDP was run in real time from March 2012 to April 2013 to cover the period of the London Olympics 2012. The system was run on a domain covering southern England and Wales nested in the UK variable resolution model (UKV). The UKV used a UK‐wide 1.5 km domain with 3 hourly cycling three‐dimensional variational data assimilation (3D‐Var) and produced 36 h forecasts every 6 h. The NDP 4D‐Var included standard observations, Doppler radar radial winds, humidity derived from a 3D cloud cover analysis and geostationary satellite upper‐tropospheric water vapour radiances not contaminated by cloud. This was used in combination with latent heat nudging of radar‐derived precipitation rates. Example case‐studies compare the NDP precipitation forecasts to both the operational extrapolation/merged nowcast system and the UKV forecasts. Objective comparison of fraction skill score for the period June to August 2012 shows that the NDP skill was greater than the latest UKV forecasts, available to forecasters at the same time as the NDP, for the whole 6 h forecast period. The skill of the NDP was greater than the operational extrapolation/merged nowcast beyond T + 2 h.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207