Unexplained agglutination of stored red blood cells in Alsever’s solution caused by the gram-negative bacterium <i>Serratia liquefaciens</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alsever's solution has been used for decades as a preservative solution for storage of RBCs. From October 2005 to January 2006, unexplained hemagglutination of approximately 10 to 20 percent of RBCs stored for several days in a modified version of Alsever's solution was noticed in quality control testing at the Canadian Blood Services Serology Laboratory. An investigation, including microbial testing, was initiated to determine the cause of the unexplained hemagglutination. The gram-negative bacterium Serratia liquefaciens was isolated from supernatant solutions of agglutinated RBCs. Further characterization of this strain revealed that it has the ability to form biofilms; presents high levels of resistance to chloramphenicol, neomycin, and gentamicin; and causes mannose-sensitive hemagglutination. The source of S. liquefaciens contamination in RBC supernatants was not found. However, this bacterium has not been isolated since January 2006 after enhanced cleaning practices were implemented in the serology laboratory where the RBCs are stored. This biofilm-forming, antibiotic-resistant S. liquefaciens strain could be directly linked to the unexplained hemagglutination observed in stored RBCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".