Selectivity of 90Sr urine bioassay technique over 241Am, 238/239PU, 210PO, 137CS and 60CO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The selectivity of a rapid (90)Sr bioassay technique over (241)Am, (238/239)Pu, (210)Po, (137)Cs and (60)Co has been investigated. Similar to (90)Sr, these radionuclides are likely to be used in radiological dispersive devices. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the degree to which the (90)Sr bioassay technique is free from interference by these radionuclides if present in a urine matrix. The interfering radionuclides were removed (from (90)Sr) by their retention on an anion exchange column. While, recovery of the target radionuclide ((90)Sr) was found to be >or= 90 %, contributions from (241)Am, (242)Pu and (208)Po were found to be <or= 3 % indicating minimal interference from these radionuclides. The breakthrough for (60)Co, however, was found to be <or=19 % indicating that it will have some interference contribution to the (90)Sr measurement if present in the urine sample. As (137)Cs was not retained at all by the anion exchange column, the method as such was not selective over (137)Cs. However, a slight modification of the method through the ammonium molybdophosphate treatment quantitatively removed Cs from the urine sample, thereby; making it selective for (90)Sr despite any (137)Cs that is present.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".