MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108829599 · doi:10.4039/ent133197-2

World review of the genus<i>Tinocallis</i>(Hemiptera: Aphididae, Calaphidinae) with description of a new species

2001· article· en· W2108829599 on OpenAlexaff
F. W. Quednau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgenusAphididaeSynonym (taxonomy)HemipteraAphidGenusBiologyBotanyKey (lock)FabaceaeZoologyHomopteraEcologyPEST analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aphid genus Tinocallis Matsumura is revised on a worldwide basis. Notes on its taxonomic position and evolutionary history and a key for the 21 species are presented. Tinocallis ussuriensis Pashtshenko and T . nevskyi lianchengensis Zhang and Qiao are proposed as synonyms of T . takachihoensis , and T . sapporoensis Higuchi is proposed as a synonym of T . nikkoensis Higuchi, T . allozelkowae Zhang and Zhong as a synonym of T . viridis (Takahashi), and T . magnoliae AK Ghosh and Raychaudhuri as a synonym of T . insularis (Takahashi). Tinocallis distinctus MR Ghosh, AK Ghosh and Raychaudhuri is returned to the subgenus Tinocallis s . s . from the subgenus Quednaucallis Chakrabarti. A lectotype designation was made for T . viridis (Takahashi). Tinocallis dalbergicola sp.nov . from Dalbergia hancei Benth. (Fabaceae) in Hong Kong is described and illustrated. It is closely related to T . caryaefoliae (Davis) and T . himalayensis AK Ghosh, MR Ghosh and Raychaudhuri, but has much longer antennae and longer spinal body processes. It also differs from the former species by the smooth mesonotum and from the latter species in having the forewing hyaline and with a complete radial sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207