World review of the genus<i>Tinocallis</i>(Hemiptera: Aphididae, Calaphidinae) with description of a new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aphid genusTinocallisMatsumura is revised on a worldwide basis. Notes on its taxonomic position and evolutionary history and a key for the 21 species are presented.Tinocallis ussuriensisPashtshenko andT.nevskyi lianchengensisZhang and Qiao are proposed as synonyms ofT.takachihoensis, andT.sapporoensisHiguchi is proposed as a synonym ofT.nikkoensisHiguchi,T.allozelkowaeZhang and Zhong as a synonym ofT.viridis(Takahashi), andT.magnoliaeAK Ghosh and Raychaudhuri as a synonym ofT.insularis(Takahashi).Tinocallis distinctusMR Ghosh, AK Ghosh and Raychaudhuri is returned to the subgenusTinocallis s.s. from the subgenusQuednaucallisChakrabarti. A lectotype designation was made forT.viridis(Takahashi).Tinocallis dalbergicolasp.nov. fromDalbergia hanceiBenth. (Fabaceae) in Hong Kong is described and illustrated. It is closely related toT.caryaefoliae(Davis) andT.himalayensisAK Ghosh, MR Ghosh and Raychaudhuri, but has much longer antennae and longer spinal body processes. It also differs from the former species by the smooth mesonotum and from the latter species in having the forewing hyaline and with a complete radial sector.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".