MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108885276 · doi:10.1017/s0022112009990784

Flow of viscoelastic jet with moderate inertia near channel exit

2009· article· en· W2108885276 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Saffari, Roger E. Khayat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsViscoelasticityDeborah numberInertiaNewtonian fluidHagen–Poiseuille equationElasticity (physics)PhysicsOpen-channel flowReynolds numberClassical mechanicsBoundary layerPipe flowReynolds stressFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steady-state moderately inertial jet flow of a viscoelastic liquid of the Oldroyd-B type, emerging from a two-dimensional channel, is examined theoretically in this study. Poiseuille flow conditions are assumed to prevail far upstream from the exit. The problem is solved using the method of matched asymptotic expansions. The small parameter involved in the expansions is the inverse Reynolds number. The flow and stress fields are obtained as composite expansions by matching the flow in the boundary-layer region near the free surface and the flow in the core region. The influence of elasticity on the shape of the free surface, the profiles of velocity and stress and the interplay between inertia and elasticity are explored. It is found that even for a jet with moderate inertia, elastic effects play a significant role, especially close to the channel exit near the free surface. It is also found that similar to the Newtonian case, the viscoelastic jet contracts downstream from the channel exit. However, in contrast to Newtonian jet, a viscoelastic jet is preceded by a flat region very close to the channel exit at which elastic and inertial effects are in balance. The extent of this region increases with elasticity. A momentum integral balance is applied to validate the theory and obtain the jet contraction ratio explicitly in terms of the Deborah number, viscosity ratio and Reynolds number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.547

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207