Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin from Chitosan-Carrageenan Nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Novel chitosan-carrageenan nanoparticles were produced through the process of ionotropic gelation for the encapsulation and controlled release of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu-EPO). The effects of chitosan concentration, chitosan to carrageenan mass ratio and solution pH on the nanoparticle diameter, polydispersity and surface charge were explored through both screening and response surface modeling (RSM) methods. The chitosan-carrageenan nanoparticles created had particle diameters between 200 and 1000 nm, surfaces charges between 40 and 55 mV, and polydispersity between 0.2 and 0.35. RSM optimized chitosan-carrageenan nanoparticles demonstrated an increased rHu-EPO encapsulation efficiency of 47.97 ± 4.10% and a more sustained in vitro release of ~50% over a 2 week period when compared to previous nano/microparticle delivery systems. Studies on the effect of surface charge and chitosan molecular weight on the encapsulation and controlled release of rHu-EPO revealed that increasing either led to improved encapsulation efficiency and reduced release rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it