MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108998869 · doi:10.1109/tit.2010.2050793

New Construction of $M$-Ary Sequence Families With Low Correlation From the Structure of Sidelnikov Sequences

2010· article· en· W2108998869 on OpenAlexaff
Nam Yul Yu, Guang Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For primepand a positive integerm, it is shown thatM-ary Sidelnikov sequences of periodp2m-1, ifM|pm-1, can be equivalently generated by the operation of elements in a finite fieldGF(pm), including apm-arym-sequence. From the(pm-1) ×(pm+1) array structure of the sequences, it is then found that a half of the column sequences and their constant multiples have low correlation enough to construct newM-ary sequence families of periodpm-1. In particular, newM-ary sequence families of periodpm-1 are constructed from the combination of the column sequence families and known Sidelnikov-based sequence families, where the new families have larger family sizes than the known ones with the same maximum correlation magnitudes. Finally, it is shown that the newM-ary sequence family of periodpm-1 and the maximum correlation magnitude2√{pm}+6 asymptotically achieves√2times the equality of the Sidelnikov's lower bound whenM=pm-1 for odd primep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207