Mode II Delamination Toughness in Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymers with Bridging Fibers and Stitching Threads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents results for mode II delamination resistance of fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) using a recently developed internal notched flexure (INF) test. The study showed that the decrease of the compliance with the growth of delamination in the INF test was much less than that predicted by analytical or finite element analyses of the same configuration. The difference was mainly due to pronounced shear force interaction generated by bridging fibers and stitching threads between fracture surfaces. A new data-deducing method, named direct method with correction (DMC), was developed for establishing a delamination resistance curve (R-curve), which can take into account the effects of shear force interaction but does not require in situ measurement of crack growth length. The DMC was further examined using results from a series of INF tests with variation in test set-up configurations and types of glass fiber preform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".