MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109017769 · doi:10.1243/09596518jsce906

Adaptive spacecraft formation flying with actuator saturation

2010· article· en· W2109017769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)SpacecraftLemma (botany)Parameterized complexityActuatorController (irrigation)Gravitational fieldSaturation (graph theory)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringAlgorithmClassical mechanicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a non-linear adaptive controller for the multiple spacecraft formation flying problem. The formulation allows for gravitational field models of arbitrary order, and a broad class of linearly parameterized external disturbance force models. This paper builds upon previous results using feedback of the filtered error. Making use of Barbalat's lemma, a broad class of controllers feeding back the filtered error is obtained, which encompasses the linear feedback that is typically used in the literature. In particular, conditions are presented under which the linear feedback is asymptotically stable under actuator saturation. The resulting controller performance is demonstrated with a numerical simulation for a relative orbit under J2 perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it