MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109017769 · doi:10.1243/09596518jsce906

Adaptive spacecraft formation flying with actuator saturation

2010· article· en· W2109017769 on OpenAlexaff
Anton de Ruiter

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)SpacecraftLemma (botany)Parameterized complexityActuatorController (irrigation)Gravitational fieldSaturation (graph theory)Computer scienceMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringAlgorithmClassical mechanicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a non-linear adaptive controller for the multiple spacecraft formation flying problem. The formulation allows for gravitational field models of arbitrary order, and a broad class of linearly parameterized external disturbance force models. This paper builds upon previous results using feedback of the filtered error. Making use of Barbalat's lemma, a broad class of controllers feeding back the filtered error is obtained, which encompasses the linear feedback that is typically used in the literature. In particular, conditions are presented under which the linear feedback is asymptotically stable under actuator saturation. The resulting controller performance is demonstrated with a numerical simulation for a relative orbit under J2 perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I Journal of Systems and Control EngineeringSame topicSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlFrench-language works237,207