MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Bronchial Thermoplasty on Airway Smooth Muscle and Collagen Deposition in Asthma

2015· article· en· W2109021660 on OpenAlexafffund
Jamila Chakir, Ikhlass Haj-Salem, Delphine Gras, Philippe Joubert, Eve‐Léa Beaudoin, Sabrina Biardel, Noël Lampron, Simon Martel, Pascal Chanez, Louis‐Philippe Boulet, Michel Laviolette

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
KeywordsBronchial thermoplastyMedicineBiopsyAsthmaAirwayBronchoscopySurgeryUrologyRadiologyInternal medicineAirway resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: The aim of bronchial thermoplasty is to improve asthma symptoms by reducing central airway smooth muscle mass. Up to now, the reduction of smooth muscle mass has been documented for only 1 group of 10 patients who had 15% or more of their pretreatment total bronchial biopsy area occupied by smooth muscle. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of bronchial thermoplasty on airway smooth muscle mass and airway collagen deposition in adult patients with asthma, regardless of pretreatment smooth muscle area. METHODS: Seventeen patients with asthma underwent bronchial thermoplasty over the course of three visits. At Visit 1, bronchial biopsies were taken from the lower lobe that was not treated during this session. At Visit 2 (3-14 wk after the first visit), all 17 patients underwent biopsy of the lower lobe treated during the first procedure. At Visit 3 (7-22 wk after the first visit), nine patients agreed to undergo biopsy of the same lower lobe. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed on the biopsy specimens. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Bronchial thermoplasty decreased airway smooth muscle from 12.9 ± 1.2% of the total biopsy surface at Visit 1 to 4.6 ± 0.8% at Visit 2 (P < 0.0001). For the nine patients who underwent a third biopsy, mean airway smooth muscle area was 5.3 ± 1.3% at Visit 3 (P = 0.0008 compared with baseline). Bronchial thermoplasty also decreased Type I collagen deposition underneath the basement membrane from 6.8 ± 0.3 μm at Visit 1 to 4.3 ± 0.2 μm at Visit 2 (P < 0.0001) and to 4.4 ± 0.4 μm for nine patients at Visit 3 (P < 0.0001 compared with baseline). Over the course of 1 year after treatment, the doses of inhaled corticosteroid, the number of severe exacerbations, and asthma control all improved (P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with severe asthma, bronchial thermoplasty reduced the smooth muscle mass of treated airway segments, regardless of the baseline level of muscle mass. Treatment also altered the deposition of collagen. At follow-up, bronchial thermoplasty improved asthma control; however, the limited number of subjects did not allow us to evaluate possible correlations between these improvements and the studied histological parameters. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and evaluate their persistence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207