MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109042700 · doi:10.33524/cjar.v13i3.57

INCLUSIVENESS & LARGE SCALE STUDIES: AN EXPLOSIVE ISSUE

2013· article· en· W2109042700 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kurt W. Clausen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Action Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNothingPoliticsScale (ratio)SociologyExplosive materialLawWorld War IICriminologyMedia studiesPolitical scienceHistoryEpistemologyCartographyGeographyArchaeologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landmines are a particular nasty side of war. They care nothing about your political or economic stances, age, religion, culture, social status or skin colour. Their only target is proximity. If you happen to be in the area when one goes off, there is no discrimination. It is truly a killer with no reasoning ability: just blind mayhem. This is why the elimination of this equal opportunity assassin had been the top priority of many peacemakers in the world. Jody Williams, Hendrik Ehlers, and Princess Diana have all raised awareness of this menace. However, when it comes to eliminating the more than 110 million active landmines found in over 70 countries around the world, the work becomes a little trickier. Cheap to make and plant (as low as 3 dollars per), it can cost 50 times as much to remove these hidden bombs. The question then remains, what is the best way to proceed with their eradication?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.513
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.083 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Action ResearchSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207