MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109051163 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2010.2050379

A Global Approach for Modeling and Analysis of Edge-Coupled Traveling-Wave Terahertz Photoconductive Sources

2010· article· en· W2109051163 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Neshat, D. Saeedkia, Leila Rezaee, S. Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationSolverPhysicsPhotomixingOpticsPhotonicsPhotoconductivityReciprocity (cultural anthropology)OptoelectronicsLaserComputer scienceFar-infrared laser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a global and geometry-independent approach is proposed for accurate analysis of edge-coupled continuous wave (CW) traveling-wave terahertz photomixer sources. All major physical phenomena involved in the operation of such devices are included in three interconnected solvers, which are combined as a unified analysis tool. A photonic solver is developed to find the optical intensity across the fast photoabsorbing region from which the carrier generation rate is determined. A semiconductor solver is used to study the charge carrier transport inside the photoconductive region through drift-diffusion model, and to predict the generated photocurrent with the beat frequency of two CW lasers. An electromagnetic solver is introduced to rigorously calculate the coupled terahertz signal into the guiding transmission line through a Lorentz reciprocity theorem. Theoretical formulation behind each solver is discussed in detail, and numerical results from each solver are presented. The proposed approach is a powerful tool for global optimization of the photoconductive sources, especially for maximizing the optical-to-terahertz power conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207