MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109066394 · doi:10.1080/07060660509507221

Effects of potato dextrose broth and gelatin on germination and efficacy of<i>Phoma exigua</i>, a potential biocontrol agent for salal (<i>Gaultheria shallon</i>)

2005· article· en· W2109066394 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Shiguang Zhao, Simon F. Shamoun

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersCanadian Forest Service
KeywordsExiguaBiological pest controlGerminationGelatinBiologyAllelopathyBotanyHorticultureSpodoptera

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of a combination of four gelatin concentration levels (0.0%, 0.2%, 0.5%, and 0.8%) and eight potato dextrose broth (PDB) concentration levels (0.0%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%, and 3.0%) on water evaporation, water absorption, conidial germination, and biocontrol efficacy of conidia of Phoma exigua isolate PFC2705 for salal was evaluated. PDB and gelatin reduced water evaporation. After 3 h of evaporation at 23 °C and 22% RH, the water content of gelatin–PDB combinations increased compared with PDB alone. The relationships between the amounts of absorbed water and PDB concentration at all gelatin concentration levels were linear (p < 0.001) after 60 min in a 100% RH environment. After 240 min, the mass of absorbed water was 11.8 times the dry mass of the 0.5% gelatin and 1.5% PDB combination, and this relationship did not change significantly over the following 16 h. PDB and gelatin increased conidial germination and might have provided nutrition for conidia of P. exigua PFC2705 at different RH environments. Conidia of PFC2705 did not germinate in sterilized ion-free water, germinated somewhat (4% to 10%) in gelatin suspensions, and germinated well (average 89%) in suspensions of different concentrations of PDB or gelatin–PDB combinations after 24 h at 23 °C. The average conidial germination at 24 h was 76% in 100% RH, 12% in 97.5% RH, and 0.0% at 92.5% RH; at 48 h it was 44.4% in 97.5% RH and 20% in 92.5% RH. No conidia germinated when RH was lower than 92.5% over 48 h. Conidia in the gelatin–PDB combinations smeared on slides stored for 4 weeks at 23 °C with 22% RH had an average conidial germination rate of 20% after 16 h incubation at 100% RH. Gelatin–PDB combinations with 0.5% gelatin and 1.5% to 2.5% PDB caused significantly larger lesions on detached young salal leaves (20 to 25 days old) than other gelatin–PDB combinations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207