MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109067873 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2008.5151811

Wake removal for clear side-scan images

2008· article· en· W2109067873 on OpenAlexafffund
Geoff Mullins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSonarBathymetrySide-scan sonarBackscatter (email)Context (archaeology)Computer scienceSynthetic aperture sonarRemote sensingArtifact (error)GeologyMarine mammals and sonarAcousticsOpticsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-angle swath bathymetry (MASB) sonars are typically used for bathymetry applications but their unique characteristics make them useful for generating clear side-scan images of the bottom, free from artifacts produced by wakes, surface bounce multi-path signals and water column targets. MASB sonars use a small array of long vertically stacked array elements to estimate the angle of arrival for backscatter. Unlike interferometric sonars which can estimate only one angle of arrival, MASB sonars can estimate the arrival angle of multiple same-time targets and therefore the potential exists for separating bottom backscatter from unwanted backscatter. Side-scan sonar is used to obtain high resolution images of the bottom but because of the wide beam it also picks up backscatter from wakes, water column targets, and surface bounce multi-path. This unwanted backscatter obscures the bottom image sometimes making it necessary to resurvey the area if these artifacts are present. Wakes are particularly bothersome in high traffic water ways and busy harbors where it may be necessary to get clear images of the bottom for security or search and recovery applications. This paper shows how MASB processing techniques coupled with beam steering can be used to generate artifact free images of the bottom. The paper begins by briefly outlining MASB sonar principles and then presents the methodology for generating clear bottom images. Element and composite beam patterns are presented for an actual MASB sonar system and these patterns are discussed in the context of target discrimination and artifact removal. Examples are presented of actual side-scan images contaminated by wakes, water column targets, and surface bounce multi-path signals. The data for these images is processed using the techniques described and new side-scan images are presented free of artifacts. A byproduct of the process is that side-scan images of wakes and water column targets can be produced alone without the bottom. This type of image is useful for situations where the water column or wake targets are of primary interest. Finally, conclusions are drawn with regard to the application of these techniques for obtaining unobscured bottom images or images of water column targets or wakes alone for security, and search and survey applications in high traffic areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207