Controlling the assembly of hydrogen-bonded supramolecular polymers by the strategy of molecular tectonics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Studies of how hydrogen bonding can be used to control molecular association continue to yield exciting discoveries in supramolecular chemistry. A simple way to make molecules that associate predictably is to link carefully selected cores to functional groups that form multiple hydrogen bonds according to reliable patterns. Bifunctional molecules constructed according to this strategy can associate to form linear aggregates robust enough to warrant the name supramolecular polymers, even though the bifunctional monomers are joined only by hydrogen bonds. More complex molecules with multiple hydrogen-bonding sites can be devised so that neighbors are held in predetermined positions, giving crystalline solids with predictable architectures and properties not previously seen in other materials. Initial studies of the ability of such compounds to associate in solution and in the molten state suggest that hydrogen-bonded networks can be purposefully designed to create novel par- tially ordered liquid materials, including liquid crystals, gels, and fluids with unusual rheological properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it