Texture image retrieval based on a Gaussian mixture model and similarity measure using a Kullback divergence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) system, indexing feature vectors and the similarity measure between feature vectors are two key factors for retrieval performance. We present a new CBIR system with statistical-model based image feature extraction in the wavelet domain and a Kullback divergence based similarity measure. A two component Gaussian mixture model (GMM) in the wavelet domain is employed and the model parameters are used to form features for image indexing. A new Kullback divergence based similarity measure is then presented for image retrieval. The experimental results demonstrate that the similarity measure based on the Kullback divergence is more effective than conventional similarity measures, such as the city-block distance and the Euclidean distance. It is shown that the new CBIR system, with the combination of the GMM and the new Kullback divergence based similarity measure, outperforms most other methods in retrieval performance for texture images, while keeping a comparable level of computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it