Ryanoid Modification of the Cardiac Muscle Ryanodine Receptor Channel Results in Relocation of the Tetraethylammonium Binding Site
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The interaction of ryanodine and derivatives of ryanodine with the high affinity binding site on the ryanodine receptor (RyR) channel brings about a characteristic modification of channel function. In all cases, channel open probability increases dramatically and single-channel current amplitude is reduced. The amplitude of the ryanoid-modified conductance state is determined by structural features of the ligand. An investigation of ion handling in the ryanodine-modified conductance state has established that reduced conductance results from changes in both the affinity of the channel for permeant ions and the relative permeability of ions within the channel (Lindsay, A.R.G., A. Tinker, and A.J. Williams. 1994. J. Gen. Physiol. 104:425-447). It has been proposed that these alterations result from a reorganization of channel structure induced by the binding of the ryanoid. The experiments reported here provide direct evidence for ryanoid-induced restructuring of RyR. TEA+ is a concentration- and voltage-dependent blocker of RyR in the absence of ryanoids. We have investigated block of K+ current by TEA+ in the unmodified open state and modified conductance states of RyR induced by 21-amino-9alpha-hydroxyryanodine, 21-azido-9alpha-hydroxyryanodine, ryanodol, and 21-p-nitrobenzoylamino-9alpha-hydroxyryanodine. Analysis of the voltage dependence of block indicates that the interaction of ryanoids with RyR leads to an alteration in this parameter with an apparent relocation of the TEA+ blocking site within the voltage drop across the channel and an alteration in the affinity of the channel for the blocker. The degree of change of these parameters correlates broadly with the change in conductance of permeant cations induced by the ryanoids, indicating that modification of RyR channel structure by ryanoids is likely to underlie both phenomena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".