In Vitro Characterization of the Interaction between HIV-1 Gag and Human Lysyl-tRNA Synthetase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viral assembly is mediated by multiple protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. Human tRNA(Lys3) is used as the primer for HIV reverse transcription, and HIV Gag and GagPol are required for packaging of the tRNA into virions. Human lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) is also specifically packaged into HIV, suggesting a role for LysRS in tRNA packaging. Gag alone is sufficient for packaging of LysRS, and these two proteins have been shown to interact in vitro using glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays. In vitro pull-down assays using truncated constructs have also revealed that residues important for homodimerization of Gag and LysRS are critical for the Gag/LysRS interaction. In this work, we report further in vitro characterization of the interaction between HIV Gag and human LysRS using affinity pull-down assays, fluorescence anisotropy measurements and gel chromatography. An equilibrium binding constant of 310 +/- 80 nM was measured for the Gag/LysRS interaction. We also show that capsid alone binds to LysRS with a similar affinity as full-length Gag. Point mutations that disrupt the homodimerization of LysRS and Gag in vitro do not affect their interaction. These results suggest that dimerization of each protein per se is not required for the interaction but that residues involved in forming the homodimer interfaces contribute to heterodimer formation. Gel chromatography studies further support the formation of a Gag/LysRS heterodimer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".