Relationships between dinoflagellate cyst assemblages in surface sediment and hydrographic conditions in the Bering and Chukchi seas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Palynological analyses were performed on 52 surface sediment samples from the eastern part of the Bering Sea and Chukchi Sea in order to document the regional distribution of dinoflagellate cyst assemblages and their relationship with sea‐surface conditions. The assemblages present a relatively high species diversity (20 taxa are recovered routinely), especially in the Bering Sea, where they are dominated by Operculodinium centrocarpum and the cyst of Pentapharsodinium dalei accompanied mainly by Spiniferites elongatus s.l., Spiniferites ramosus, Impagidinium pallidum , Brigantedinium spp., Islandinium minutum, Selenopemphix quanta, Selenopemphix nephroides, Quinquecuspis concreta and the cyst of Polykrikos kofoidii . The percentages of the main taxa vary with latitude, and principal component analysis shows that the distribution of assemblages is closely related to hydrographic conditions, notably the seasonal duration of sea‐ice cover and the sea‐surface temperature in February. The dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from the Bering Sea differ significantly from those of subarctic seas of the North Atlantic, with respect to their species composition and relationships with sea‐surface conditions. In particular, the occurrence of the cyst of Polykrikos kofoidii and Quinquecuspis concreta and the positive correlation between the percentages of Operculodinium centrocarpum and the extent of sea‐ice, constitute peculiar features in the Bering Sea assemblages. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".