Resident beavers (<i>Castor canadensis</i>) do not discriminate between castoreum scent marks from simulated adult and subadult male intruders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Subadult intruding beavers (Castor spp.) could be expected to pose a higher threat than adults to territory holders because, unlike adults who usually own a territory, subadults need to acquire a territory and a mate to reproduce successfully. We tested the responses of territorial beavers ( Castor canadensis Kuhl, 1820) to simulated intrusions by adult and subadult males. Territorial intrusion was simulated through scent playback experiments that exposed residents to castoreum from adult and subadult strangers simultaneously. We obtained responses from 13 resident beavers. Neither sniffing response nor physical or total responses differed between castoreum from adults and subadults. This was true for both sexes combined and separate. There was also no significant correlation between the mass of the scent donor and the response intensity. We found no evidence that territorial beavers responded differentially to castoreum scent marks from intruders of different ages. Either beavers consider all strange intruders as posing a high threat and hence do not treat them differentially or castoreum does not contain sufficient information to allow beavers to discriminate between age classes. We suggest that rather than directly assessing intruders by means of intrinsic information contained in the scent mark, beavers assess their competitors through scent matching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".