Sorption and capillary condensation in wood and the moisture content of red pine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The major purpose of this study is to improve hygrothermal simulation of wood responses to environmental vapor and moisture conditions under high relative humidity conditions. The article first reviews moisture property–related wood microstructures, sorption behavior, the concept of fiber saturation point, the potential for vapor to condense in wood under high relative humidity conditions, the measurement of equilibrium moisture content using traditional sorption methods, and the use of pressure plate test method at relative humidities above 95%. It then summarizes the results of equilibrium moisture content measurements for red pine sapwood at high relative humidity conditions using both sorption and pressure plate methods, with capillary saturation as maximum moisture content. It also discusses a number of wood microstructure and end-use-related factors that could influence the moisture content in service and the measurement of equilibrium moisture content in laboratory. Inconsistencies were found with other equilibrium moisture content data using the pressure plate test method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it