MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2109346271 · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.01.008

Measuring Therapeutic Response in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. Response Criteria Working Group Report

2006· article· en· W2109346271 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Z. Pavletic, Paul J. Martin, Stephanie J. Lee, Sandra A. Mitchell, David A. Jacobsohn, Edward W. Cowen, Maria L. Turner, Görgün Akpek, Andrew L. Gilman, George B. McDonald, Mark Schubert, Ann Berger, Peter Bross, Jason W. Chien, Daniel R. Couriel, James P. Dunn, Jane M. Fall‐Dickson, Ann T. Farrell, Mary E.D. Flowers, Hildegard Greinix, Steven Hirschfeld, Lynn H. Gerber, Stella Kim, Robert Knobler, Peter A. Lachenbruch, Frederick W. Miller, Barbara B. Mittleman, Esperanza B. Papadopoulos, Susan K. Parsons, Donna Przepiorka, M. Robinson, Michael E. Ward, Bryce B. Reeve, Lisa G. Rider, Howard M. Shulman, Kirk R. Schultz, Daniel Weisdorf, Georgia B. Vogelsang

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNaval Medical Research CenterPediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant ConsortiumNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAmerican Society for Blood and Marrow TransplantationHealth Resources and Services AdministrationU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialDiseaseGraft-versus-host diseaseIntensive care medicineConsistency (knowledge bases)TransplantationChronic diseaseSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.387
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.339
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3870.339
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.012
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0120.008
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.213
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations565
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→