Population subdivision in westslope cutthroat trout (<i>Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi</i>) at the northern periphery of its range: evolutionary inferences and conservation implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi, Salmonidae) are native to the upper Columbia, Missouri, and South Saskatchewan river drainages of western North America and are at the northern periphery of their range in southeastern British Columbia, Canada. We examined geographical variation in allele frequencies at eight microsatellite loci in 36 samples of westslope cutthroat trout from British Columbia to assess levels of population subdivision and to test the hypothesis that different habitat types (principally mainstem vs. above migration barrier habitats) would influence levels of genetic diversity, genetic divergence among populations, and attainment of equilibrium between gene flow and genetic drift. Across all samples, the mean number of alleles per locus was 3.9 and mean expected heterozygosity was 0.56. Population subdivision was extensive with an overall Fst (theta) of 0.32. Populations sampled above migration barriers had significantly fewer alleles, lower expected heterozygosity, but greater average pairwise Fst than populations sampled from mainstem localities. We found evidence for isolation-by-distance from a significant correlation between genetic distance and geographical distance (r = 0.31), but the pattern was much stronger (r = 0.51) when above barrier populations and a population that may have been involved in headwater exchanges were removed. By contrast, isolation-by-distance was not observed when only above barrier populations were tested among themselves. Our data support the maintenance of separate demographic management strategies for westslope cutthroat trout inhabiting different river systems and illustrate how differing habitat structure (e.g. presence of migration barriers) may influence patterns of biodiversity and gene flow-drift equilibrium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".