MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109521055 · doi:10.1109/scft.2000.878416

Low-rate quantization of spectral information in a 4 kb/s pitch-synchronous CELP coder

2002· article· en· W2109521055 on OpenAlexaff
Driss Guerchi, P. Mermelstein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCode-excited linear predictionSpeech codingLinear predictive codingSpeech recognitionQuantization (signal processing)Codec2Computer scienceVector sum excited linear predictionVector quantizationHarmonic Vector Excitation CodingPitch detection algorithmLinear predictionAlgorithmCodecSpeech processingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new efficient algorithm for quantizing the spectral information for a pitch-synchronous CELP (PSCELP) speech coder is proposed. LPC analysis in the PSCELP is carried out once per pitch period. Direct quantization of the pitch synchronous LSF vectors would lead to a variable-rate codec, which is inconsistent with the objective of achieving a fixed-rate speech coder operating at 4 kb/s. Hence, a linear trajectory of LSF vectors is selected which can be encoded by one LSF vector each 20 ms. This conversion exploits the high correlation between successive pitch periods of the LSF parameters to achieve joint quantization. A coding rate of 1.2 kb/s is achieved for the LSF information with no noticeable degradation. The proposed algorithm employs linear interpolation at the decoder to recover the spectral parameters for the individual pitch periods used in the pitch-synchronous reconstruction of the speech signal. The comparison simulation results show that this algorithm produces comparable performance to that of LSF's linear interpolation quantization in a time-synchronous CELP coder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207