MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109570586 · doi:10.1002/arch.20067

Isolation, cloning, and tissue expression of a putative octopamine/tyramine receptor from locust visceral muscle tissues

2005· article· en· W2109570586 on OpenAlexaff
Goudarz Molaei, Jean‐Paul Paluzzi, William G. Bendena, Angela B. Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyComplementary DNALocustOctopamine (neurotransmitter)TyraminecDNA libraryMolecular biologyG protein-coupled receptorBiochemistryReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Octopamine has been shown to play major roles in invertebrate nervous systems as a neurotransmitter, neuromodulator, and neurohormone. Tyramine is the biochemical precursor of octopamine and its neuromodulatory role is now being investigated and clarified in invertebrates, particularly in insects. Both octopamine and tyramine mediate their actions via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are believed to play important functions in the regulation of physiological processes in locust oviduct. Here we report the isolation, cloning, and tissue expression of a putative octopamine/tyramine receptor from the locust, Locusta migratoria. Degenerate oligonucleotides in PCR reactions were first used to obtain partial cDNA sequences and then these partial sequences were used in screens to obtain a full-length cDNA. The cloned cDNA is about 3.1 kb long and encodes a protein of 484 amino acid residues with typical characteristics of GPCRs including seven transmembrane domains and many signature residues. The amino acid sequence of the cloned cDNA displays sequence similarities with known GPCRs, particularly octopamine/tyramine receptors. Screening of the locust genomic DNA library resulted in isolation of a genomic DNA with the same size as the cDNA, indicating that the gene is intron-less. RT-PCR and Northern blot analyses revealed the expression of the receptor mRNA in brain, ventral nerve cord, oviduct, and midgut tissues. Southern blot analyses using EcoRI and HindIII restriction endonucleases recognized at least two distinct gene bands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Insect Biochemistry and PhysiologySame topicNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchFrench-language works237,207