Coliphage as an indicator of fecal contamination in hydroponic cucumber (<i>Cucumis sativus</i> L) greenhouses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A preliminary study has been performed to evaluate the utility of somatic and F + ‐specific coliphage as quality indicators of irrigation water used in hydroponic cucumber greenhouse operations. Samples of incoming water, waste hydroponic solution, cucumber fruit and plant roots derived from two greenhouses were screened for bacterial fecal indicators (generic Escherichia coli , fecal coliforms, total coliforms and Clostridium perfringens ) and coliphage. Bacterial fecal indicators were present in incoming water and in spent hydroponic solution with coliphage only being sporadically recovered. However, both somatic and F + ‐specific coliphage were consistently recovered from the roots of cucumber plants along with bacterial fecal indicators. Despite the heavy contamination of plant roots, the cucumber fruits were within acceptable microbiological limits. F + ‐specific coliphage was recovered from 1 out of 25 cucumbers tested along with generic E coli . In contrast, no somatic coliphage was recovered from cucumbers despite coliforms being present on 15 out of 25 units. In conclusion, coliphage represents a poor index of hydroponic irrigation water quality but presence on cucumber fruit and roots can be used to highlight the presence of fecal indicator bacteria within greenhouse operations. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".