Nailfold capillary density is importantly associated over time with muscle and skin disease activity in juvenile dermatomyositis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the longitudinal association of nailfold capillary density (NCD; as a potential marker of activity) with various other clinical measures of disease activity and to evaluate baseline NCD as a predictor of disease outcome in children with JDM. METHODS: Data from 809 clinic visits from 92 JDM patients were prospectively collected at each clinic visit over a time period of 5.5 years. The number of capillaries per millimetre at the distal nailfold was scored using a stereomicroscope. Disease activity was determined using the Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS) and a modification of the validated disease activity score (DAS), which included three skin (SDAS) and three muscle (MDAS) criteria. An inception cohort subgroup (n=28) with a baseline visit at diagnosis was analysed separately. RESULTS: Both DAS subscores, MDAS (β = -0.04437, P < 0.0001) and SDAS (β = -0.1589, P < 0.0001), as well as the CMAS (β = 0.02165, P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with loss of end row nailfold capillary over time (multiple regression mixed-model analysis). All patients in the inception subcohort showed a reduced baseline NCD (diagnostic sensitivity = 100%) that improved as the disease improved, but this did not predict longer term outcome or course of disease. CONCLUSION: NCD is a marker of skin and muscle disease activity, and is an important measure of disease activity changes from visit to visit. Determination of capillary density may be useful when making treatment decisions. A decrease in NCD may be considered for inclusion in the diagnostic criteria due to its high sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".