Murine Pancreatic Beta TC3 Cells Show Greater<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>-Oligoadenylate Synthetase (<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>AS) Antiviral Enzyme Activity and Apoptosis Following IFN-<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math>or Poly(I:C) Treatment than Pancreatic Alpha TC3 Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes is caused by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic beta cells, possibly virus initiated. Virus infection induces alpha-interferon (IFN-alpha), leading to upregulation of genes encoding double-stranded (ds) RNA-dependent antiviral enzymes 2', 5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2'5'AS) and PKR (p68). To investigate whether beta cell specificity could be due to antiviral differences between beta and alpha cells, we treated beta and alpha TC3 cell lines with IFN-alpha and/or poly(I:C) (a synthetic dsRNA). Results showed that, following IFN-alpha stimulation, increases in 2'5'AS levels and activities were significantly higher in beta than alpha cells (P < .001), whereas increases in PKR level and activity were comparable in the two cell types. Poly(I:C) stimulated 2'5'AS activity in beta but not alpha cells, and co-transfection IFN-alpha plus poly(I:C) induced apoptosis in beta but not alpha cells. These findings suggest that the elevated 2'5'AS response of pancreatic beta cells could render them particularly vulnerable to damage and/or apoptosis during virus infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".