ATENDIMENTO AO INDIVÍDUO COM TRANSTORNO MENTAL: PERSPECTIVA DE UMA EQUIPE DA ESTRATÉGIA DE SAÚDE DA FAMÍLIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A proximidade das equipes da Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) com as famílias faz com que se tornem recurso fundamental para a reinserção dos pacientes com transtornos mentais na comunidade. O presente estudo teve como objetivo caracterizar o atendimento dos pacientes com demandas de saúde mental em uma ESF e identificar o conhecimento da equipe acerca da definição de transtorno mental e da reabilitação psicossocial. Trata-se de estudo descritivo, com nove profissionais de uma ESF de um município do estado de São Paulo. Foram realizadas entrevistas estruturadas e os dados foram analisados utilizando-se a técnica de análise de conteúdo. Os resultados mostraram a ausência de conduta padronizada dos profissionais para os pacientes com transtorno mental. Os participantes apresentaram dificuldades na definição de transtorno mental e seus sintomas. Para a equipe estudada, lidar com usuários com transtornos psiquiátricos exige estratégias inovadoras que possibilitem o atendimento integral.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".