Viscoelastic effects on drop deformation in steady shear
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper applies a diffuse-interface model to simulate the deformation of single drops in steady shear flows when one of the components is viscoelastic, represented by an Oldroyd-B model. In Newtonian fluids, drop deformation is dominated by the competition between interfacial tension and viscous forces due to flow. A fundamental question is how viscoelasticity in the drop or matrix phase influences drop deformation in shear. To answer this question, one has to deal with the dual complexity of non- Newtonian rheology and interfacial dynamics. Recently, we developed a diffuse-inter-face formulation that incorporates complex rheology and interfacial dynamics in a unified framework. Using a two-dimensional spectral implementation, our simulations show that, in agreement with observations, a viscoelastic drop deforms less than a comparable Newtonian drop. When the matrix is viscoelastic, however, the drop deformation is suppressed when the Deborah number $De$ is small, but increases with $De$ for larger $De$ . This non-monotonic dependence on matrix viscoelasticity resolves an apparent contradiction in previous experiments. By analysing the flow and stress fields near the interface, we trace the effects to the normal stress in the viscoelastic phase and its modification of the flow field. These results, along with prior experimental observations, form a coherent picture of viscoelastic effects on steady-state drop deformation in shear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it