MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109702138 · doi:10.1139/v09-030

8-Isocyanoamphilecta-11(20),15-diene, a new antimalarial isonitrile diterpene from the sponge <i>Ciocalapata</i> sp.

2009· article· en· W2109702138 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chatchai Wattanapiromsakul, Naphatson Chanthathamrongsiri, Somchai Bussarawit, Supreeya Yuenyongsawad, Anuchit Plubrukarn, Khanit Suwanborirux

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMarine Sponges and Natural Products
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDiterpeneStereochemistryPlasmodium falciparumSpongeDieneCytotoxicityIn vitroBiochemistryOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new isonitrile diterpene of the amphilectane family, 8-isocyanoamphilecta-11(20),15-diene (4), was isolated from the sponge Ciocalapata sp., along with three known isonitriles, 8,15-diisocyano-11(20)-amphilectene (1), 7-isocyanoamphilecta-11(20),15-diene (2), and 8-isocyanoamphilecta-11(20),14-diene (3), and two steroidal peroxides, ergosterol peroxide (5) and 5α,9α-epidioxy-8α,14α-epoxy-(22E)-ergosta-6,22-dien-3β-ol (6). The structure of the new isonitrile was elucidated spectroscopically. In addition, anomalous multiplicities in the NMR spectra of some isolated isonitriles were observed and are reported here. The four isonitriles were strongly active against Plasmodium falciparum K1 with IC 50 in a range of 0.09–1.07 μmol/L. Except for 1, which was cytotoxic against both MCF-7 and fibroblast cell lines, the other three diterpenes showed no significant cytotoxicity against either targeted cell lines. On the other hand, the steroidal peroxides 5 and 6, which were less active in the antimalarial bioassay (IC 50 values of 6.28 and 7.13 µmol/L, respectively), were strongly cytotoxic against MCF-7 (IC 50 values of 0.025 and 0.003 µmol/L, respectively), with very little toxicity against human fibroblasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.772

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsFrench-language works237,207