MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109702905 · doi:10.1016/s0967-0653(97)83651-4

10.1016/s0967-0653(97)83651-4

2000· article· en· W2109702905 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuri N. Skiba, Julián Adem, Tomás Morales Acoltzi

Bibliographic record

VenueTime to knit · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBoundary (topology)Sensitivity (control systems)Finite differenceHadamard transformApplied mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adjoint method is applied to derive simple integral formulas for the sensitivity study of the Adem Ocean Thermodynamic Model to small variations both in the heat forcing and in the initial and boundary conditions In each formula, the adjoint model solution is a useful source of information about the contribution of such variations to average sea surface temperature anomaly in a certain region. Thanks to special conditions set at inflow and outflow liquid boundaries- the main and adjoint thermodynamic models are well-posed in the sense of Hadamard (1923) not only for closed, but also for open oceanic basins. Balanced and absolutely stable implicit finite-difference schemes of the 2nd order approximation both in space and m time are constructed for the main and adjoint ocean thermodynamic models. The schemes are based on the splitting method and easily solved by the factorization. Both unsplit and split difference operators ofthese schemes satisfy the discreto Lagrange identity at every time step. In the nondissipative and unforced case when there is no flux across the liquid boundaries, the schemes have two conservation laws each.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9880.998

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.152
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTime to knitSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207