MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2109726136 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r241-02

Illinois Transient Model: Simulating the Flow Dynamics in Combined Storm Sewer Systems

2011· article· en· W2109726136 on OpenAlex
Arturo S. León, Nils Oberg, Arthur R. Schmidt, Marcelo H. García

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
KeywordsWater hammerMechanicsOpen-channel flowFlow (mathematics)Free surfacePotential flowTransient (computer programming)Bernoulli's principleGeologyGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the capabilities and features of the recently developed Illinois transient model (ITM) for simulating the flow dynamics (transient and non-transient conditions) in combined storm sewer systems, ranging from dry bed flows, to gravity flows, to partly gravity-partly surcharged flows (mixed flows), to fully pressurized flows (water hammer flows). ITM, which was originally developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, is a finite volume (FV) model that can handle complex boundary conditions such as drop shafts, reservoirs, closing and opening of gates as a function of time, and junctions with any number of connecting pipes and any types of horizontal and vertical alignment. ITM is open source code that is in constant development and its releases are made available on a regular basis. In the current version of ITM (v. 1.3, September 2010), the free surface region is modeled using the one dimensional (1-D) Saint-Venant equations. The pressurized region is modeled using the 1-D compressible water hammer equations. Open channel-pressurized flow (mixed flow) interfaces are modeled by enforcing mass, momentum and energy relations across the interfaces together with Riemann solvers at the sides of mixed flow interfaces. This version of ITM is referred to as the two equation model. The current version of ITM is superior to other models of its kind because it is robust, can simulate mixed flows (simultaneous occurrence of free surface and pressurized flows) when using actual pressure wave celerities (~1 000 m/s), and because no Preissmann slot assumption is made to simulate pressurized flows (water hammer flows). ITM has been applied to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it