Efficacy and mechanism of adenovirus-mediated VEGF-165 gene therapy for augmentation of skin flap viability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Skin ischemic necrosis due to vasospasm and/or insufficient vascularity is the most common complication in the distal portion of the skin flap in reconstructive surgery. This project was designed to test our hypothesis that preoperative subdermal injection of adenoviral vectors encoding genes for vascular endothelial growth factor-165 (Ad.VEGF-165) or endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (Ad.eNOS) effectively augments skin viability in skin flap surgery and that the mechanism of Ad.VEGF-165 gene therapy involves an increase in synthesis/release of the angiogenic and vasodilator factor NO. PBS (0.5 ml) or PBS containing Ad.VEGF-165, Ad.eNOS, or adenovirus (Ad.Null) was injected subdermally into the distal half of a mapped rat dorsal skin flap (4 x 10 cm) 7 days preoperatively, and skin flap viability was assessed 7 days postoperatively. Local subdermal gene therapy with 2 x 10(7)-2 x 10(10) plaque-forming units of VEGF-165 increased skin flap viability compared with PBS- or Ad.Null-injected control (P < 0.05). Subdermal Ad.VEGF-165 and Ad.eNOS gene therapies were equally effective in increasing skin flap viability at 5 x 10(8) plaque-forming units. Subdermal Ad.VEGF-165 therapy was associated with upregulation of eNOS protein expression, Ca2+ -dependent NOS activity, synthesis/release of NO, and increase in capillary density and blood flow in the distal portion of the skin flap. Injection of the NOS inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (15 mg/kg im), but not the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (5 mg/kg im), 45 min preoperatively completely abolished the increase in skin flap blood flow and viability induced by Ad.VEGF-165 injected subdermally into the mapped skin flap 7 days preoperatively. We have demonstrated for the first time that 1) Ad.VEGF-165 and Ad.eNOS mapped skin flap injected subdermally into the mapped skin flap 7 days preoperatively are equally effective in augmenting viability in the rat dorsal skin flap compared with control, 2) the mechanism of subdermal Ad.VEGF-165 gene therapy in augmenting skin flap viability involves an increase in NO synthesis/release downstream of upregulation of eNOS protein expression and Ca2+ -dependent NOS activity, and 3) the vasodilating effect of NO may predominantly mediate subdermal Ad.VEGF gene therapy in augmenting skin flap blood flow and viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".