MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2109783508 · doi:10.1086/345986

Galaxy Clustering Evolution in the UH8K Weak‐Lensing Fields

2003· article· en· W2109783508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGalaxyRedshiftCluster analysisCorrelation function (quantum field theory)Field galaxyRedshift surveyPopulationGalaxy formation and evolutionCluster (spacecraft)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present measurements of the two-point galaxy angular correlation function as a function of apparent magnitude, color, and morphology. Our analysis utilizes images taken using the UH8K CCD mosaic camera on the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. Six 0 5 × 0 5 fields were observed for a total of 2 hr each in I and V , resulting in catalogs containing ~25,000 galaxies per field. We present new galaxy number counts to limiting magnitudes of I = 24.0 and V = 25.0. We divide each passband sample into intervals of width 1 mag. Within each magnitude interval, we parameterize the angular correlation function by A ω θ -δ and find ω(θ) to be well described by a power law of index δ = 0.8. We find the amplitude of the correlation function, A ω , to decrease monotonically with increasingly faint apparent magnitude. We compare with predictions that utilize redshift distributions based on deep spectroscopic observations. We conclude that simple redshift-dependent models that characterize evolution by means of the parameter inadequately describe the observations. This is because the predictions do not allow for the varying mix of morphologies and absolute luminosities (and hence clustering strengths) of galaxies sampled at different apparent magnitudes. We find a strong clustering dependence on V-I color. This is because galaxies of extreme color lie at similar redshifts and the angular correlation functions for these samples are minimally diluted by chance projections. We find extremely red ( V - I = 3.0) galaxies (likely early-type galaxies at z ~ 1) to have an A ω about 10 times higher, and extremely blue ( V - I = 0.5) galaxies (likely local late types) to have an A ω about 15-20 times higher, than that measured for the full field population. We then present the first attempt to investigate the redshift evolution of clustering, utilizing a population of galaxies of the same morphological type and absolute luminosity. We study the dependence of ω(θ) on redshift for L * early-type galaxies in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 0.9. Although uncertainties are large, we find the evolution in the clustering of these galaxies to be consistent with stable clustering [ = 0 for a redshift dependence of the spatial correlation function, ξ( r ), parameterized as ξ( r , z ) = -γ (1 + z ) -(3+ ) ]. We find L * early-type galaxies to cluster slightly more strongly (physical correlation length r 0 = 5.25 ± 0.28 h -1 Mpc assuming = 0) than the local full field population. This is in good agreement with the correlation length measured by the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey for L * early-type galaxies in the local universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→