Microstructure and superconducting properties of Bi-2212/Ag tapes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to understand the effects of processing parameters on the formation of Bi-2212 phase and to improve superconducting properties, Bi2212 (nominal composition Bi/sub 2/Sr/sub 2/Ca/sub 1/Cu/sub 2/O/sub x/), sheathed with silver was fabricated and thermo-mechanically treated for this study. Scanning electron microscopy was employed to investigate the phases and microstructure at different stages of the Bi-2212 formation and in the final materials. A SQUID magnetometer was used to characterize the T/sub c/ of the conductors. Voltage-current (V-I) characteristics were measured with a standard four-probe method at 77 K in different magnetic fields in order to improve the correlation of magnetic properties to microstructural properties. The critical current density is /spl sim/15000 A/cm/sup 2/ at 77 K self field. The critical current distribution in the conductors was studied by computing the second differential of the VI curves and the correlation between the microstructure and the second differential was analyzed. The current transfer to the metal sheath and the effect of the sheath on the shape of the VI curve are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".