MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A chimeric ribozyme in <i>Clostridium difficile</i> combines features of group I introns and insertion elements

2000· article· en· W2109901314 on OpenAlexaff
Veit Braun, Markus Mehlig, Michael Moos, Maja Rupnik, Bettina Kalt, D. E. Mahony, Christoph von Eichel‐Streiber

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersJohannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGroup II intronBiologyInsertion sequenceGroup I catalytic intronRibozymeGeneticsIntronGeneOpen reading frameRNA splicingORFSOperonRNATransposable elementEscherichia coliGenomePeptide sequence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CdlSt1, a DNA insertion of 1975 bp, was identified within tcdA-C34, the enterotoxin gene of the Clostridium difficile isolate C34. Located in the catalytic domain A1-C34, Cd/St1 combines features of two genetic elements. Within the first 434 nt structures characteristic for group I introns were found; encoding the two transposase-like proteins tlpA and tlpB nucleotides 435-1975 represent the remainder of a IS605-like insertion element. We show that the entire CdlSt1 is accurately spliced from tcdA-C34 primary transcripts and that purified TcdA-C34 toxin is of regular size and catalytic activity. A search for CdlSt1-related sequences demonstrates that the element is widespread in toxinogenic and non-toxinogenic C. difficile strains, indicating the mobility of CdlSt1. In strain C34, we characterize 10 CdlSt1 variants; all are highly homologous to CdlSt1 (> 93% identity), integrated in bacterial open reading frames (ORFs), show the typical composite structure of CdlSt1 and are precisely spliced from their primary transcripts. CdlSt1-like chimeric ribozymes appear to combine the invasiveness of an insertion element with the splicing ability of a group I intron, rendering transposition harmless for the interrupted gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchFrench-language works237,207