Kineto–static roll plane analysis of articulated tank vehicles with arbitrary tank geometry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The roll stability of an articulated tank vehicle with partial liquid load is discussed from the viewpoint of fundamental mechanics of vehicle response and quantitative influence of size and weight variables. A kineto–static roll plane model for a partially filled tank vehicle of arbitrary tank geometry is developed incorporating the moments and forces associated with liquid movement within the tank. A roll plane model for a partially filled tank of arbitrary shape is developed and integrated with the static roll plane model of the vehicle. The influence of liquid motion within the tank during a steady turning manoeuvre is investigated. The rollover immunity of the tank vehicle is investigated through computer simulation. The vertical and lateral translation of the fluid bulk during steady turning is computed using an iterative algorithm. The corresponding roll moments and forces arising due to liquid motion are incorporated into the static roll model to study the rollover immunity levels of liquid tank vehicles. The influence of tank geometry and liquid fill level on the rollover immunity of the tank vehicles is presented. The rollover threshold levels of the tank vehicle are compared to that of an equivalent rigid cargo vehicle for various loading conditions. The influence of compartmenting of the tank and the influence of the location of the trailer axles on the rollover immunity levels is studied and an optimal order of unloading the various compartments is determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it